Compare literature in information security governance and information security management..
The introduction clearly and concisely defines the project’s purpose, scope, and structure.
The body of the paper relates to the topic, is adequately developed, and is logically structured.
Primary and secondary sources are integrated to support the argument.
Evaluative information is presented logically, adhering to APA and course specifications.
The conclusion is concise and effectively includes one or more of the following:
Synthesis of information.
Course of action.
Broader implications.
Significance to the field.
Connections to related issues.
Recommendations.
Opportunities for future research.
Other appropriate concluding techniques.
Scoring guide
Criteria Non-performance Basic Proficient Distinguished Comments
Analyze information security governance principles, guidelines, and policies.
Does not identify information security governance principles, guidelines, and policies. Identifies, but does not analyze, information security governance principles, guidelines, and policies. Proficient
Analyzes information security governance principles, guidelines, and policies. Analyzes information security governance principles, guidelines, and policies, and articulates how they relate to the workplace, home or home office setting.
Analyze strategic effect of security governance principles, guidelines, and polices on information security management.
Does not describe potential effect of security governance principles, guidelines, and policies on information security management. Describes potential effect of security governance principles, guidelines, and policies on information security management. Proficient
Analyzes strategic effect of security governance principles, guidelines, and polices on information security management. Analyzes strategic effect of security governance principles, guidelines, and policies on information security management, and provide scholarly evidence and relevant examples to support the analysis.
Compare literature in information security governance and information security management.
Does not cite or compare, literature related to both information security governance, and information management. Cites literature related to both information security governance, and information management, but does not compare it. Proficient
Compares literature in information security governance and information security management. Compares literature in information security governance, and information management, synthesizing findings and describing the relevance to current needs in the field.
Compare the strengths and weaknesses of information security governance and information security management.
Does not identify strengths and weaknesses of information security governance and information security management. Identifies, but does not compare, strengths and weaknesses of information security governance and information security management. Proficient
Compares the strengths and weaknesses of information security governance and information security management. Compares the strengths and weaknesses of information security governance and information security management, and identifies future areas of research.
Analyze the breadth and depth of topic areas in information security governance and information security management.
Does not describe characteristics of topic areas in information security governance and information security management that relate to their breadth and depth. Describes characteristics of topic areas in information security governance and information security management that relate to their breadth and depth, but does not analyze them. Proficient
Analyzes the breadth and depth of topic areas in information security governance and information security management. Analyzes the breadth and depth of topic areas in information security governance and information security management, and identifies areas that need of further research.
Demonstrate effective academic writing and communication skills, making few, if any, grammatical or mechanical errors.
Does not demonstrate adequate academic writing and communication skills with significant grammatical and mechanical errors. Inconsistently demonstrates effective academic writing and communication skills, makes a significant number of grammatical or mechanical errors. Proficient
Demonstrates effective academic writing and communication skills, making few if any grammatical or mechanical errors. Demonstrates effective academic writing and communication skills, making few if any grammatical or mechanical errors, and uses language, tone, and organization that enhances the reader’s ability to locate and understand key material.
Compare literature in information security governance and information security management.