A critical appraisal of current theoretical discourse regarding treatment of Bell’s Palsy. An evaluative exploration of the evidence must demonstrate strategic awareness of policy drivers that influence decisions. 3500words Module Specific Criteria.
A critical appraisal of current theoretical discourse regarding treatment of Bell’s Palsy. An evaluative exploration of the evidence must demonstrate strategic awareness of policy drivers that influence decisions. 3500words Module Specific Criteria
1Explores one aspect of minor ailments providing rationale for chosen discussion. 2Critically analyses new insights at the forefront of the subject area being explored. 3Demonstrates originality in application of knowledge and a systematic approach in synthesis and evaluation of evidence. 4Critically appraises wider issues that impact practice. Considers strategic policy that influences decision-making. 5Arguments should be well sustained and substantiated by a wide range of appropriate literature. 6Structure and presentation should be clear and logical with attention to grammar and spelling. 7Harvard referencing system adhered to. 8Confidentiality and anonymity maintained. 9Word Limit Assignment is within the specified word limit 3500words.
You must word process all assignments unless otherwise stated in the assignment details. Your manuscripts must have the following format:
Font size 12 point
Arial font
Double-spaced
Margins 2 cm left and right and top and bottom
All pages must be numbered
A word count should be included at the very start (before the title) of the assignment
feedback i have received:
A highly relevant choice of subject with good rational for selection. Several grammatical and sentence construction issues identified throughout the essay, but non that detracted too much from the main focus. More thorough proof reading should minimise this in future. Please ensure you reference all statements of fact appropriately , including dates! You appeared to lean very heavily towards the NICE guidelines. At level 7 you need to be approaching information from a critical perspective. Not to say that the evidence is poor, it just is important you look at the primary literary sources before accepting guidelines as gospel. Very little discussion seen, and at times heavily descriptive. A greater level of criticality around literary sources is expected to achieve a higher grade at level 7. You need to demonstrate your ability to critique appropriate sources of information that enable you to come to a well rounded conclusion. Unfortunately you essay appears to be a description of treatment options.
